Home Boys' Lists Girls' Lists Men's Teams Women's Teams News Photos Contributors Links Help Sign-UpOnline Store
Latest News | Categories | Authors | News Archives
 
 

News & Features

Special Feature
Countdown: Fitting In Doubles Proves Challenging
Share:    

Doubles is:

  1. fun to play and watch,
  2. an appetizer for singles play,
  3. a vehicle for juniors to improve their games,
  4. a key point in a Division I dual match,
  5. a scheduling nightmare

Doubles is played using a dizzying number of different formats
© Zoo Tennis
The correct answer, of course, is all of the above, demonstrating why settling on one scoring format for the four-person version of the game has proven impossible.

The professional tours moved to no-ad scoring and a match tiebreaker in lieu of a third set to provide a shorter, more reliable time frame for doubles competition, although the four slams have resisted adopting that format except in mixed doubles. The ITF Pro and Junior Circuits also play the WTA and ATP format, but the USTA has never endorsed it for their events.

But when NCAA Division I tennis went to an even more radical format - one standard tiebreak set with no-ad scoring - in an effort to shave time from its dual matches, the USTA chose to follow that lead, now using it at National Level 2s and at the new Level 1 National Indoor Championships coming this November. Doubles is abbreviated even more at USTA National, Intersectional and Zonal Team Championships, which play no-ad with a tiebreaker at 5-all, not 6-all.

Other USTA Level 1 events have additional variations, none of which involve no-ad scoring. The USTA National Doubles Championships [for 14s and 16s age divisions] employ best-of-three tiebreak sets, while other USTA National Championships switch from a match tiebreaker in lieu of a third set to a standard best-of-three format after the quarterfinals.

Each of these formats can be viewed as the solution to a specific problem, but the net result is less doubles being played per tournament - which may turn out to be an obstacle to the USTA's mission of growing the game.

Truncating doubles does allow tournament directors more leeway in scheduling, permitting more matches to be completed in a single day while still providing adequate rest. But has the emphasis on singles gone too far?

Maria Cercone, now manager of junior competition for the USTA Southern section, is able to look at the issue from all sides. A player development coach, a tennis parent and a tournament director in Florida for 35 years, Cercone is also a member of the USTA's Junior Competition Committee.

This Article Is Available Only to Recruiting Advantage members
 
Please log in to access premium TennisRecruiting.net content.
LOG IN
NOT REGISTERED?
Register Now For Free!
  • Content Updated Daily
  • Complete Rank Lists
  • Exclusive Articles
  • Recruit Interviews
It's Quick, Easy, and Free!
 

 
 TENNIS WAREHOUSE PRODUCT REVIEW
 
Head Graphene 360+ Radical MP Tennis Racquet Review (2021)
 
To purchase this product or for a much more detailed written review, Click Here!
 
RECENT COMMITMENTS
12/02 Felix Obermair chooses Old Dominion
12/02 Anya Tkachyk chooses Ball State
12/02 Arush Gupta chooses Campbell
12/02 Gabriella Sadowski chooses Purdue
12/02 Olivia Watson chooses Centre
12/02 Hugh Outwater chooses Franklin & Marshall
12/02 Emma Flanigan chooses Grove City
12/01 Eva Kovachev chooses Trinity (TX)
12/01 Marina Markina chooses Old Dominion
11/30 Preston Mcarthy chooses St. Lawrence

Full Listings: Boys' Commits & Girls' Commits

 
 

Page updated on Monday, November 04, 2024
Contact our web team with any corrections